Jun. 4th, 2004

chicken: (01. yellowchicken)
[livejournal.com profile] kerri9494 said I should spam this stuff into my LJ, so here goes.

Edited at 20:33 EDT to add that of course [livejournal.com profile] kerri9494 has already tested all the Windows browsers (that run under XP, of course) and has those results sitting on her hard drive.

Any Linux users out there? [livejournal.com profile] paulv? If so, when you have a minute, please report your Linux browsers' behaviors, I'm curious.

So anyway, I was previously aware of the lameness of most browsers when it comes to rendering many of the more obscure UTF-8 characters.

One of our projects is all about the Sanskrit, which is written in a character set called Devanagari.

This is represented in Unicode in the U+0900 to U+0970 range (aka the 0xE0A480 to 0xE0A5B0 range in UTF-8 hex).

So I decided to put the "lame browsers" theory to the test.

I tested lots of Mac browsers for problems vis-a-vis Devanagari UTF-8, etc.

I took the word "evaM" (which means 'thus', I think) as the test. It ought to look like this in a browser that understands utf-8:

image of devanagari word

Here are the Results of the Tests. )

Profile

chicken: (Default)
chicken

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 78 9 1011
12131415161718
192021 22232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags