chicken: (49. FF companions by wickedgoddess_)
[personal profile] chicken
Can't say more for fear of SPOILING anyone who hasn't seen Serenity. If you have seen it, though, here's the Joss Whedon Melbourne Q & A to which I've been referring in comments in other people's LJs.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-03 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kerri9494.livejournal.com
Ebert and Roper each gave it a thumbs up, according to the tee vee last night.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-03 01:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chicken-cem.livejournal.com
Yes!! A good boost. That actually came out in podcast form on Friday night. The New York Times also loved it. Pretty much all the critics loved it (with the exception of the Brain-dead USA Today and Variety, both of which had enough factual errors in their reviews to lend them a total lack of credibility).

Sadly, Flightplan (in its second week, and despite poor reviews) pulled in $15 million to beat Serenity which got $10.1 million. Sadly I think this is mostly attributable to star power -- having a big star like Jodie Foster is a sure draw for a movie (whereas Serenity has no big names). Still, Serenity killed Jessica Alba's "Into the Blue" (which only made about $7 million), coming out on top as the highest grossing new release.

Next week Wallace & Gromit will probably do some damage, but if the "drop off" from one weekend to the next isn't bad, Serenity could stay around for a while and still earn enough to warrant a sequel (the budget was pretty small so it shouldn't be hard).

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-03 04:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paulv.livejournal.com
Thanks for posting this.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-03 04:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chicken-cem.livejournal.com
Glad you found it helpful (he was chattier with the Aussies than he was at a lot of U.S. pre-screenings).

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-03 05:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anelith.livejournal.com
Thanks! What I found most interesting was what he had to say about possible sequels. Something I had previously thought very unlikely.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-03 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chicken-cem.livejournal.com
Yep, that's why I found it compelling, esp. his statements about certain people being in those sequels.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-03 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anelith.livejournal.com
Flashbacks, you think?

(no subject)

Date: 2005-10-03 05:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chicken-cem.livejournal.com
Or something more prequel-y? He's clever, it could end up being a bit of both, or some third thing we haven't thought of.

Profile

chicken: (Default)
chicken

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 78 9 1011
12131415161718
192021 22232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags