(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-26 04:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Oh, yeah, but! Firefox's contextual menus are much better than Safari's. Why Safari's are so stripped-down, I'll never figure out.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-26 07:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chicken-cem.livejournal.com
Agreed. Firefox has two or three more options on right-click than Safari does, like 'Send Link', 'Send Image', 'Properties', etc. But more crucially, it divides the contextual options into groups (separated by horizontal lines) for easy visual identification, whereas Safari pretty much doesn't.

(no subject)

Date: 2005-02-26 09:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
It's possible that Safari de-emphasizes contextual menus because, being an Apple product, its developers are adhering to the ideology of the one-button mouse, with which contextual menus are marginally more difficult to invoke. But there are relatively elaborate ones even in the Finder, so that explanation doesn't make a lot of sense.

Profile

chicken: (Default)
chicken

April 2009

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 78 9 1011
12131415161718
192021 22232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags