That LJ comments meme
Oct. 7th, 2004 02:01 pmWho's been commenting in your journal?
| (Self comments excluded from rankings) | |||
| 2 | 135 comments | ||
| 3 | 99 comments | ||
| 4 | 86 comments | ||
| 5 | 67 comments | ||
| 6 | 37 comments | ||
| 7 | 30 comments | ||
| 8 | 25 comments | ||
| 9 | 25 comments | ||
| 10 | 24 comments | ||
| 11 | 19 comments | ||
| 12 | 18 comments | ||
| 13 | 16 comments | ||
| 14 | 13 comments | ||
| 15 | 10 comments | ||
| 16 | 7 comments | ||
| 17 | 7 comments | ||
| 18 | 7 comments | ||
| 19 | 7 comments | ||
| 20 | 6 comments | ||
| 21 | 6 comments | ||
| 22 | 6 comments | ||
| 23 | 6 comments | ||
| 24 | 6 comments | ||
| 25 | 5 comments | ||
| 26 | 4 comments | ||
| 27 | 4 comments | ||
| 28 | 4 comments | ||
| 29 | 4 comments | ||
| 30 | 4 comments | ||
| 31 | 3 comments | ||
| 32 | 3 comments | ||
| 33 | 3 comments | ||
| 34 | 3 comments | ||
| 35 | 2 comments | ||
| 36 | 2 comments | ||
| 37 | 2 comments | ||
| 38 | 2 comments | ||
| 39 | 1 comments | ||
| 40 | 1 comments | ||
| 41 | 1 comments | ||
| 42 | 1 comments | ||
| 43 | 1 comments | ||
| 44 | 1 comments | ||
| 45 | 1 comments | ||
| 46 | 1 comments | ||
| 47 | 1 comments | ||
| 48 | 1 comments | ||
| 49 | 1 comments | ||
| 50 | 1 comments | ||
| 51 | 1 comments | ||
| 52 | 1 comments | ||
| 53 | 1 comments | ||
| 54 | 1 comments | ||
| 55 | 1 comments | ||
| 56 | 1 comments | ||
These statistics were generated using the LJ Stats Web Interface by
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 11:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 12:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 12:13 pm (UTC)Of course, I could comment more if I understood all of your posts.
What's Linux?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 12:33 pm (UTC)It's just an operating system (like XP, OS X, Unix, etc). Some say much better than any other modern OS. Certainly more secure!
The zealots insist on always calling it 'gnu/linux'. Richard Stallman is *the* GNU inventor guy who started it all, and he always tries to emphasize the 'gnu' (clever recursive name: stands for 'gnu's not unix') part because he feels the 'linux' part has been co-opted by the non-open-source people (Red Hat, etc.), and now connotes something he doesn't fully believe follows his Dream of an operating system that is truly free from the closed-code policy followed by the likes of Bill Gates et al. Rant rant rant.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 12:35 pm (UTC)You comment plenty. Not being on my friends list for as many months as many of the people above you in the stats, how could you possibly have commented more? Not possible. :-)
And I was just thinking that if it weren't for you, most
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 12:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 01:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 02:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 07:13 pm (UTC)I know a couple who met online; they knew they attended the same school, but had never met, and had only corresponded via email and also by chatting frequently on the Mainframe. One day, they were in a Mainframe talk session, sending messages back and forth to each other, as usual. In those days, our school was equipped with VT100 terminals (literal vt100 terminals, the actual hardware) and the like, and each time one would receive a message, the terminal would beep loudly. Of course, they started to notice that the beeping sounds from across the room corresponded to the time delay between the time each of them would send a message. Finally one of them got up, came over to the other, and introduced herself! They are still together and have a couple of kids.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 05:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-10-07 07:14 pm (UTC)